ATF-C-API(3)

NAME
ATF_CHECK, ATF_CHECK_MSG, ATF_CHECK_EQ, ATF_CHECK_EQ_MSG, ATF_CHECK_STREQ, ATF_CHECK_STREQ_MSG, ATF_CHECK_ERRNO, ATF_REQUIRE, ATF_REQUIRE_MSG, ATF_REQUIRE_EQ, ATF_REQUIRE_EQ_MSG, ATF_REQUIRE_STREQ, ATF_REQUIRE_STREQ_MSG, ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO, ATF_TC, ATF_TC_BODY, ATF_TC_BODY_NAME, ATF_TC_CLEANUP, ATF_TC_CLEANUP_NAME, ATF_TC_HEAD, ATF_TC_HEAD_NAME, ATF_TC_NAME, ATF_TC_WITH_CLEANUP, ATF_TC_WITHOUT_HEAD, ATF_TP_ADD_TC, ATF_TP_ADD_TCS, atf_no_error, atf_tc_expect_death, atf_tc_expect_exit, atf_tc_expect_fail, atf_tc_expect_pass, atf_tc_expect_signal, atf_tc_expect_timeout, atf_tc_fail, atf_tc_fail_nonfatal, atf_tc_pass, atf_tc_skip - C API to write ATF-based test programs

SYNOPSIS
#include <atf-c.h>
ATF_CHECK(expression);
ATF_CHECK_MSG(expression, fail_msg_fmt, ...);
ATF_CHECK_EQ(expression_1, expression_2);
ATF_CHECK_EQ_MSG(expression_1, expression_2, fail_msg_fmt, ...);
ATF_CHECK_STREQ(string_1, string_2);
ATF_CHECK_STREQ_MSG(string_1, string_2, fail_msg_fmt, ...);
ATF_CHECK_ERRNO(exp_errno, bool_expression);
ATF_REQUIRE(expression);
ATF_REQUIRE_MSG(expression, fail_msg_fmt, ...);
ATF_REQUIRE_EQ(expression_1, expression_2);
ATF_REQUIRE_EQ_MSG(expression_1, expression_2, fail_msg_fmt, ...);
ATF_REQUIRE_STREQ(string_1, string_2);
ATF_REQUIRE_STREQ_MSG(string_1, string_2, fail_msg_fmt, ...);
ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO(exp_errno, bool_expression);
ATF_TC(name);
ATF_TC_BODY(name, tc);
ATF_TC_BODY_NAME(name);
ATF_TC_CLEANUP(name, tc);
ATF_TC_CLEANUP_NAME(name);
ATF_TC_HEAD(name, tc);
ATF_TC_HEAD_NAME(name);
ATF_TC_NAME(name);
ATF_TC_WITH_CLEANUP(name);
ATF_TC_WITHOUT_HEAD(name);
ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp_name, tc_name);
ATF_TP_ADD_TCS(tp_name);
atf_no_error();
atf_tc_expect_death(reason, ...);
atf_tc_expect_exit(exitcode, reason, ...);
atf_tc_expect_fail(reason, ...);
atf_tc_expect_pass();
atf_tc_expect_signal(signo, reason, ...);
atf_tc_expect_timeout(reason, ...);
atf_tc_fail(reason);
atf_tc_fail_nonfatal(reason);
atf_tc_pass();
atf_tc_skip(reason);

DESCRIPTION
The ATF

C-based test programs always follow this template:

    ... C-specific includes go here ...
    #include <atf-c.h>
    ATF_TC(tc1);
    ATF_TC_HEAD(tc1, tc)
    {
        ... first test case's header ...
    }
    ATF_TC_BODY(tc1, tc)
    {
        ... first test case's body ...
    }
    ATF_TC_WITH_CLEANUP(tc2);
    ATF_TC_HEAD(tc2, tc)
    {
        ... second test case's header ...
    }
    ATF_TC_BODY(tc2, tc)
    {
        ... second test case's body ...
    }
    ATF_TC_CLEANUP(tc2, tc)
    {
        ... second test case's cleanup ...
    }
    ATF_TC_WITHOUT_HEAD(tc3);
    ATF_TC_BODY(tc3, tc)
    {
        ... third test case's body ...
    }
    ... additional test cases ...
    ATF_TP_ADD_TCS(tp)
    {
        ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tcs, tc1);
        ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tcs, tc2);
        ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tcs, tc3);
        ... add additional test cases ...
        return atf_no_error();
    }

  Definition of test cases
Test cases have an identifier and are composed of three different parts: the header, the body and an optional cleanup routine, all of which are described in atf-test-case(4). To define test cases, one can use the ATF_TC(), ATF_TC_WITH_CLEANUP() or the ATF_TC_WITHOUT_HEAD() macros, which take a single parameter specifiying the test case's name. ATF_TC(), requires to define a head and a body for the test case, ATF_TC_WITH_CLEANUP() requires to define a head, a body and a cleanup for the test case and ATF_TC_WITHOUT_HEAD() requires only a body for the test case. It is important to note that these do not set the test case up for execution when the program is run. In order to do so, a later registration is needed with the ATF_TP_ADD_TC() macro detailed in Program initialization.

Later on, one must define the three parts of the body by means of three functions. Their headers are given by the ATF_TC_HEAD(), ATF_TC_BODY() and ATF_TC_CLEANUP() macros, all of which take the test case name provided to the ATF_TC() ATF_TC_WITH_CLEANUP(), or ATF_TC_WITHOUT_HEAD() macros and the name of the variable that will hold a pointer to the test case data. Following each of these, a block of code is expected, surrounded by the opening and closing brackets.

  Program initialization
The library provides a way to easily define the test program's main() function. You should never define one on your own, but rely on the library to do it for you. This is done by using the ATF_TP_ADD_TCS() macro, which is passed the name of the object that will hold the test cases; i.e. the test program instance. This name can be whatever you want as long as it is a valid variable identifier.

After the macro, you are supposed to provide the body of a function, which should only use the ATF_TP_ADD_TC() macro to register the test cases the test program will execute and return a success error code. The first parameter of this macro matches the name you provided in the former call. The success status can be returned using the atf_no_error() function.

  Header definitions
The test case's header can define the meta-data by using the atf_tc_set_md_var() method, which takes three parameters: the first one points to the test case data, the second one specifies the meta-data variable to be set and the third one specifies its value. Both of them are strings.

  Configuration variables
The test case has read-only access to the current configuration variables by means of the bool atf_tc_has_config_var(), const char * atf_tc_get_config_var(), const char * atf_tc_get_config_var_wd(), bool atf_tc_get_config_var_as_bool(), bool atf_tc_get_config_var_as_bool_wd(), long atf_tc_get_config_var_as_long(), and the long atf_tc_get_config_var_as_long_wd() functions, which can be called in any of the three parts of a test case.

  Access to the source directory
It is possible to get the path to the test case's source directory from any of its three components by querying the ‘srcdir’ configuration variable.

  Requiring programs
Aside from the require.progs meta-data variable available in the header only, one can also check for additional programs in the test case's body by using the atf_tc_require_prog() function, which takes the base name or full path of a single binary. Relative paths are forbidden. If it is not found, the test case will be automatically skipped.

  Test case finalization
The test case finalizes either when the body reaches its end, at which point the test is assumed to have passed, unless any non-fatal errors were raised using atf_tc_fail_nonfatal(), or at any explicit call to atf_tc_pass(), atf_tc_fail() or atf_tc_skip(). These three functions terminate the execution of the test case immediately. The cleanup routine will be processed afterwards in a completely automated way, regardless of the test case's termination reason.

atf_tc_pass() does not take any parameters. atf_tc_fail(), atf_tc_fail_nonfatal() and atf_tc_skip() take a format string and a variable list of parameters, which describe, in a user-friendly manner, why the test case failed or was skipped, respectively. It is very important to provide a clear error message in both cases so that the user can quickly know why the test did not pass.

  Expectations
Everything explained in the previous section changes when the test case expectations are redefined by the programmer.

Each test case has an internal state called ‘expect’ that describes what the test case expectations are at any point in time. The value of this property can change during execution by any of:

atf_tc_expect_death(reason, ...)
    Expects the test case to exit prematurely regardless of the nature of the exit.

atf_tc_expect_exit(exitcode, reason, ...)
    Expects the test case to exit cleanly. If exitcode is not ‘-1’, atf-run(1) will validate that the exit code of the test case matches the one provided in this call. Otherwise, the exact value will be ignored.

atf_tc_expect_fail(reason, ...)
    Any failure (be it fatal or non-fatal) raised in this mode is recorded. However, such failures do not report the test case as failed; instead, the test case finalizes cleanly and is reported as ‘expected failure’; this report includes the provided reason as part of it. If no error is raised while running in this mode, then the test case is reported as ‘failed’.

    This mode is useful to reproduce actual known bugs in tests. Whenever the developer fixes the bug later on, the test case will start reporting a failure, signaling the developer that the test case must be adjusted to the new conditions. In this situation, it is useful, for example, to set reason as the bug number for tracking purposes.

atf_tc_expect_pass()
    This is the normal mode of execution. In this mode, any failure is reported as such to the user and the test case is marked as ‘failed’.

atf_tc_expect_signal(signo, reason, ...)
    Expects the test case to terminate due to the reception of a signal. If signo is not ‘-1’, atf-run(1) will validate that the signal that terminated the test case matches the one provided in this call. Otherwise, the exact value will be ignored.

atf_tc_expect_timeout(reason, ...)
    Expects the test case to execute for longer than its timeout.

  Helper macros for common checks
The library provides several macros that are very handy in multiple situations. These basically check some condition after executing a given statement or processing a given expression and, if the condition is not met, they report the test case as failed.

The ‘REQUIRE’ variant of the macros immediately abort the test case as soon as an error condition is detected by calling the atf_tc_fail() function. Use this variant whenever it makes now sense to continue the execution of a test case when the checked condition is not met. The ‘CHECK’ variant, on the other hand, reports a failure as soon as it is encountered using the atf_tc_fail_nonfatal() function, but the execution of the test case continues as if nothing had happened. Use this variant whenever the checked condition is important as a result of the test case, but there are other conditions that can be subsequently checked on the same run without aborting.

Additionally, the ‘MSG’ variants take an extra set of parameters to explicitly specify the failure message. This failure message is formatted according to the printf(3) formatters.

ATF_CHECK(), ATF_CHECK_MSG(), ATF_REQUIRE() and ATF_REQUIRE_MSG() take an expression and fail if the expression evaluates to false.

ATF_CHECK_EQ(), ATF_CHECK_EQ_MSG(), ATF_REQUIRE_EQ() and ATF_REQUIRE_EQ_MSG() take two expressions and fail if the two evaluated values are not equal.

ATF_CHECK_STREQ(), ATF_CHECK_STREQ_MSG(), ATF_REQUIRE_STREQ() and ATF_REQUIRE_STREQ_MSG() take two strings and fail if the two are not equal character by character.

ATF_CHECK_ERRNO() and ATF_REQUIRE_ERRNO() take, first, the error code that the check is expecting to find in the errno variable and, second, a boolean expression that, if evaluates to true, means that a call failed and errno has to be checked against the first value.

EXAMPLES
The following shows a complete test program with a single test case that validates the addition operator:

    #include <atf-c.h>
    ATF_TC(addition);
    ATF_TC_HEAD(addition, tc)
    {
        atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr",
                          "Sample tests for the addition operator");
    }
    ATF_TC_BODY(addition, tc)
    {
        ATF_CHECK_EQ(0 + 0, 0);
        ATF_CHECK_EQ(0 + 1, 1);
        ATF_CHECK_EQ(1 + 0, 1);
        ATF_CHECK_EQ(1 + 1, 2);
        ATF_CHECK_EQ(100 + 200, 300);
    }
    ATF_TC(string_formatting);
    ATF_TC_HEAD(string_formatting, tc)
    {
        atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr",
                          "Sample tests for the snprintf");
    }
    ATF_TC_BODY(string_formatting, tc)
    {
        char buf[1024];
        snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "a %s", "string");
        ATF_CHECK_STREQ_MSG("a string", buf, "%s is not working");
    }
    ATF_TC(open_failure);
    ATF_TC_HEAD(open_failure, tc)
    {
        atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr",
                          "Sample tests for the open function");
    }
    ATF_TC_BODY(open_failure, tc)
    {
        ATF_CHECK_ERRNO(ENOENT, open("non-existent", O_RDONLY) == -1);
    }
    ATF_TC(known_bug);
    ATF_TC_HEAD(known_bug, tc)
    {
        atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr",
                          "Reproduces a known bug");
    }
    ATF_TC_BODY(known_bug, tc)
    {
        atf_tc_expect_fail("See bug number foo/bar");
        ATF_CHECK_EQ(3, 1 + 1);
        atf_tc_expect_pass();
        ATF_CHECK_EQ(3, 1 + 2);
    }
    ATF_TP_ADD_TCS(tp)
    {
        ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, addition);
        ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, string_formatting);
        ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, open_failure);
        ATF_TP_ADD_TC(tp, known_bug);
        return atf_no_error();
    }

SEE ALSO
atf-test-program(1), atf-test-case(4), atf(7)